The first was Warren Ellis' Transmetropolitan by an SFX writer (which was a pity as I'd really have liked a shot at that and it may mean I can't do Ellis' Planetary later). The second was Charles Burns' Black Hole by Kenny. And this month (out today):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/642d0/642d08f756721556eb428a518e19c60fc4849e4b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8a88/e8a88f9709953cafeda69e991e0632c48259853e" alt=""
Oooh, look at me, in print and everything. Yes, it's silly and yes, I agree, it's not that big a deal. But still, it's nice to have my name in there.
Obviously there's a few more words to the review than that - but not that many more. When Kenny said it was 300 words per review I thought it would be a breeze. Except condensing exactly what makes something a classic graphic novel in just 300 words is a lot harder than I thought it would be. This Luther Arkwright review took a week to get right. Each time I sat and started to write 300 words I just felt so paralysed by the necessary brevity. So in the end, after a very fruitless day, I just wrote a normal review and trimmed the 700 words down to the required 300. It's a method that seems to works for me.
(And in case you were wondering what 300 words looks like - I've just written them for you - word number 300).
No comments:
Post a Comment